⚡ Quick Summary
This systematic review evaluates the use of ChatGPT in the Emergency Department (ED), highlighting its potential to assist with language generation and administrative tasks. While its capabilities are promising, the tool’s effectiveness in complex medical decision-making remains emerging but not yet robust.
🔍 Key Details
- 🧠 AI Tool: ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, United States)
- 📅 Year of Review: 2025
- 📊 Focus: Applications of ChatGPT in ED tasks
- ⚙️ Strengths: Language generation and administrative support
- ⚠️ Limitations: Variable evidence and lack of standardization
🔑 Key Takeaways
- 🤖 ChatGPT is a large language model that is free and accessible.
- 📈 Performance improvements were noted between ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.
- 🔍 Current applications include language generation and administrative tasks.
- ⚠️ Limitations exist in its use for complex medical decision-making.
- 🔮 Future iterations, like ChatGPT 5, may enhance its capabilities.
- 📚 Evidence regarding its use in the ED is still in early stages.
- 🌍 The review provides a practical guide for ED clinicians on using ChatGPT.
📚 Background
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is rapidly evolving, with tools like ChatGPT showing promise in transforming clinical practice. However, the adoption of these technologies often feels disconnected from the daily routines of clinicians, particularly in high-pressure environments like the Emergency Department. Understanding how to effectively utilize AI tools is crucial for enhancing patient care and operational efficiency.
🗒️ Study
This systematic review aimed to explore the current applications of ChatGPT in the Emergency Department, assessing its strengths and limitations. The authors, Meyer NS and Meyer JW, compiled evidence from various studies to provide a comprehensive overview of how ChatGPT can be integrated into ED practices, particularly as we approach 2025.
📈 Results
The findings indicate that while ChatGPT is effective in language generation and administrative tasks, its role in supporting complex medical decision-making is still developing. The review highlights a significant gap in standardized evidence, suggesting that further research is needed to fully understand the tool’s capabilities and limitations in clinical settings.
🌍 Impact and Implications
The implications of this review are substantial for the future of emergency medicine. As AI tools like ChatGPT become more integrated into clinical workflows, they have the potential to enhance efficiency and improve patient outcomes. However, it is essential for clinicians to remain informed about the limitations of these technologies to ensure they are used appropriately and effectively.
🔮 Conclusion
This review underscores the transformative potential of AI in the Emergency Department, particularly through tools like ChatGPT. While the current evidence is still evolving, the future looks promising for the integration of AI in clinical practice. Ongoing research and development will be crucial in unlocking the full capabilities of these technologies, paving the way for improved patient care.
💬 Your comments
What are your thoughts on the integration of AI tools like ChatGPT in emergency medicine? We would love to hear your insights! 💬 Leave your comments below or connect with us on social media:
A Practical Guide to the Utilization of ChatGPT in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Future Directions, and Limitations.
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools across various medical specialties highlights the potential for AI to transform medicine over the next 20 years. Despite this potential, the adoption of AI can feel incremental and disconnected from the daily practice of individual clinicians. For emergency department (ED) physicians practicing in 2025, recognizing and evaluating AI tools available for immediate integration into practice is essential. One such tool is ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, United States), a large language model (LLM) that is free, easily accessible via smartphones or computers, and widely used across industries. However, its usability in the ED setting remains poorly characterized. This review explores the current evidence surrounding ChatGPT 4’s applications in various ED physician tasks, documenting its strengths and limitations. While ChatGPT demonstrates significant utility in language generation and administrative tasks, its potential for supporting more complex tasks in medical decision-making is emerging but not yet robust. The available evidence is limited and variable and lacks standardization, reflecting a field still in its early stages of development. Notably, the performance improvements observed between ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 suggest that future iterations, such as the anticipated release of ChatGPT 5, could significantly impact these findings. This review provides a comprehensive snapshot of the current state of evidence regarding ChatGPT’s use in the ED, offering both an evaluation of its capabilities and a practical guide for its appropriate use by ED clinicians today.
Author: [‘Meyer NS’, ‘Meyer JW’]
Journal: Cureus
Citation: Meyer NS and Meyer JW. A Practical Guide to the Utilization of ChatGPT in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Future Directions, and Limitations. A Practical Guide to the Utilization of ChatGPT in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Future Directions, and Limitations. 2025; 17:e81802. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81802