โก Quick Summary
A recent international survey revealed that nearly 68% of audiologists and speech-language therapists are utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their academic practices. However, concerns regarding data authenticity and the potential impact on creativity highlight the need for training and ethical considerations in AI integration.
๐ Key Details
- ๐ Participants: 106 ASLT academicians from various regions, primarily Asia and North America.
- ๐ Survey Design: Cross-sectional with 18 items, including rating scales and open-ended questions.
- ๐ Survey Period: Conducted from February 2024 to April 2024.
- ๐ง AI Tools Mentioned: ChatGPT, Canva, Grammarly AI, Mentimeter, QuillBot, ResearchRabbit, Scribd.
๐ Key Takeaways
- ๐ Adoption Rate: 68% of participants reported using AI tools in their practice.
- ๐ Concerns: Issues with data authenticity, security, and incorrect citations were highlighted.
- ๐ก Creativity Impact: Frequent use of AI tools may hinder the ability to generate novel ideas.
- ๐ Training Needs: A significant number of academicians lack prior experience in AI courses.
- ๐ซ Institutional Support: There is a pressing need for universities to provide training and support for AI integration.
- โ๏ธ Ethical Considerations: AI should be used with appropriate monitoring and ethical guidelines.
๐ Background
The integration of artificial intelligence into various sectors has been transformative, particularly in healthcare and education. In the fields of audiology and speech-language therapy, the potential for AI to enhance academic practices is significant. However, understanding how these tools are currently being utilized and the challenges faced by professionals is crucial for effective implementation.
๐๏ธ Study
This study aimed to explore the use of AI tools among academicians in audiology and speech-language therapy through a comprehensive survey. The research involved 106 participants from diverse geographical backgrounds, focusing on their experiences and perceptions regarding AI in their academic work.
๐ Results
The findings indicated that a substantial 68% of participants actively use AI tools in their practice. However, concerns regarding the authenticity of data and the risk of generating irrelevant information were prevalent. Additionally, participants expressed worries that reliance on AI could diminish their capacity for creative thinking.
๐ Impact and Implications
The results of this survey underscore the growing role of AI in academia, particularly in the fields of audiology and speech-language therapy. As AI tools become more prevalent, it is essential to address the concerns raised by professionals. By providing adequate training and establishing ethical guidelines, institutions can foster a more effective and responsible integration of AI technologies in academic settings.
๐ฎ Conclusion
This study highlights the significant potential of AI tools in enhancing academic practices within audiology and speech-language therapy. However, it also emphasizes the need for training and ethical considerations to ensure that these technologies are used effectively and responsibly. The future of AI in academia looks promising, but it requires careful navigation to maximize benefits while minimizing risks.
๐ฌ Your comments
What are your thoughts on the integration of AI tools in academic practices? Do you see more benefits or challenges? Let’s discuss! ๐ฌ Share your insights in the comments below or connect with us on social media:
Use of artificial intelligence tools by audiologists and speech-language therapists: an international survey of academicians.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing across the world in every domain, such as finance, manufacturing, entertainment, agriculture, retail, healthcare, and law. Its use in the education sector has exponentially increased. The present global survey explored the utilization of AI among academicians in audiology and speech-language therapy (ASLT) and their willingness to use AI tools in their academic work.
METHOD: This study used a cross-sectional survey design. One hundred and six ASLT academicians participated in the survey (February 2024 to April 2024). The questionnaire contains 18 items, which included a five-point rating scale, yes-no, and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Most of the participants were from Asia and North America, followed by Africa. Nearly sixty-eight percent of the academicians used AI tools in their practice. The major concerns reported by the participants were the authenticity of the data, security, the addition of irrelevant information, and incorrect citations. The participants also mentioned that the frequent use of AI tools can reduce a person’s ability to devise novel ideas. AI tools such as ChatGPT, Canva, Grammarly AI, Mentimeter, QuillBot, ResearchRabbit, and Scribd were reported by participants.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the use of AI tools among ASLT academicians. However, only a few academicians have prior experience in AI courses. This indicates the pressing need for training concerning the appropriate use of AI in academia and support from universities. Furthermore, AI should be incorporated into academia with appropriate monitoring and ethical considerations.
Author: [‘Aggarwal K’, ‘Ravi R’, ‘Yerraguntla K’]
Journal: J Otol
Citation: Aggarwal K, et al. Use of artificial intelligence tools by audiologists and speech-language therapists: an international survey of academicians. Use of artificial intelligence tools by audiologists and speech-language therapists: an international survey of academicians. 2025; 20:20-25. doi: 10.26599/JOTO.2025.9540004