โก Quick Summary
A recent study compared the efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in addressing patient queries related to gonarthrosis and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The findings revealed that ChatGPT outperformed Gemini in both accuracy and patient satisfaction, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in patient education.
๐ Key Details
- ๐ฅ Participants: 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis
- โ Questions: Each patient asked five questions about surgery and rehabilitation
- ๐ Evaluation: Responses assessed by two blinded orthopaedic specialists
- ๐ Scoring: 10-point scale for accuracy and patient satisfaction
๐ Key Takeaways
- ๐ ChatGPT achieved a mean accuracy score of 8.7 compared to Gemini’s 7.2.
- ๐ Patient satisfaction was higher for ChatGPT with a score of 8.9 versus Gemini’s 7.5.
- ๐ ๏ธ Comprehensive explanations of surgical procedures were rated highest by ChatGPT (mean score: 9.2).
- ๐ Gemini excelled in providing concise summaries of recovery timelines (mean score: 8.4).
- ๐ฌ Statistical significance was noted with a p-value of < 0.001.
- ๐ก AI platforms like ChatGPT can enhance patient education and reduce preoperative anxiety.
- ๐ Future research should explore AI’s integration into clinical practice.
๐ Background
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is transforming patient education and communication. With conditions like gonarthrosis, where patients often experience anxiety regarding surgical procedures, effective communication is crucial. AI platforms can potentially bridge the gap in patient understanding and support informed decision-making.
๐๏ธ Study
This randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis who were candidates for total knee arthroplasty. Each patient posed five questions to both ChatGPT and Gemini regarding their surgery and postoperative care. The responses were evaluated for accuracy and satisfaction by orthopaedic specialists and the patients themselves.
๐ Results
The results indicated that ChatGPT significantly outperformed Gemini in both accuracy and patient satisfaction. ChatGPT’s mean accuracy score was 8.7 ยฑ 0.9, while Gemini’s was 7.2 ยฑ 1.1. In terms of patient satisfaction, ChatGPT scored 8.9 ยฑ 0.8 compared to Gemini’s 7.5 ยฑ 1.2. These findings highlight the potential of AI in enhancing patient interactions.
๐ Impact and Implications
The implications of this study are significant for the future of patient education in orthopaedics. By utilizing AI platforms like ChatGPT, healthcare providers can offer more accurate and satisfactory information to patients, potentially alleviating anxiety and improving overall patient experience. This study paves the way for further exploration of AI’s role in clinical settings.
๐ฎ Conclusion
This study underscores the superior efficacy of ChatGPT over Gemini in addressing patient queries related to gonarthrosis and TKA. As AI continues to evolve, its integration into healthcare could lead to enhanced patient education and improved outcomes. Continued research in this area is essential to fully realize the benefits of AI in clinical practice.
๐ฌ Your comments
What are your thoughts on the use of AI in patient education? Do you believe it can significantly impact patient outcomes? ๐ฌ Share your insights in the comments below or connect with us on social media:
Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has created novel opportunities for enhancing patient education and alleviating anxiety. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of two leading AI platforms, ChatGPT and Gemini, in delivering accurate and satisfactory responses to patients with gonarthrosis, considering total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis and indicated for TKA. Each patient posed five questions regarding the surgery and postoperative rehabilitation to both ChatGPT and Gemini. Responses were evaluated by two blinded orthopaedic specialists on a 10-point scale for accuracy and patient satisfaction. Patients additionally evaluated their satisfaction with each response using a 10-point scale. The main outcome measures consisted of the average accuracy scores assessed by specialists and the average satisfaction scores reported by patients. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between ChatGPT and Gemini in both accuracy and patient satisfaction (pโ<โ0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated better performance with a mean accuracy score of 8.7โยฑโ0.9 compared with Gemini’s 7.2โยฑโ1.1. Patient satisfaction scores aligned with expert evaluations, with ChatGPT achieving a mean satisfaction score of 8.9โยฑโ0.8 versus Gemini’s 7.5โยฑโ1.2. Notably, ChatGPT excelled in providing comprehensive explanations of surgical procedures (mean score: 9.2โยฑโ0.7) and postoperative care (9.1โยฑโ0.8), whereas Gemini performed better in offering concise summaries of recovery timelines (8.4โยฑโ0.9). This study demonstrates that ChatGPT offers more accurate and satisfactory responses to patient queries regarding gonarthrosis and TKA compared with Gemini. The findings suggest that AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT, can serve as valuable tools in augmenting patient education and potentially reducing preoperative anxiety. Future studies should investigate the incorporation of AI-assisted information delivery into clinical practice and its long-term effects on patient outcomes.
Author: [‘Gurbuz S’, ‘Karslioglu B’, ‘Keskin A’, ‘Igde N’, ‘Ayaz MB’, ‘Imren Y’]
Journal: J Knee Surg
Citation: Gurbuz S, et al. Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2025; (unknown volume):(unknown pages). doi: 10.1055/a-2693-0756