⚡ Quick Summary
This study evaluated the validity and reliability of an AI-based mobile application, My Jump Lab, for measuring jump height in comparison to traditional infrared contact mats. The findings indicate that while the AI app tends to overestimate jump height, it demonstrates excellent concurrent validity and strong reliability across various conditions.
🔍 Key Details
- 📊 Participants: 43 recreationally active adults (average age: 21.2 ± 2.4 years)
- ⚙️ Methodology: Dual-session, test-retest design with 3 maximal-effort trials for countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ)
- 📏 Measurement Tools: AI-based app (My Jump Lab) and force platform
- 🔍 Validity Assessment: Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses
- 📈 Reliability Evaluation: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV)
🔑 Key Takeaways
- 🤖 AI-based app provides a valid and reliable alternative for jump height assessment.
- 📏 Overestimation: The AI app systematically overestimated jump height by +2.81 cm.
- 📊 Excellent Validity: Achieved an R² of 0.94 for concurrent validity.
- 🔒 Strong Reliability: Within-session reliability (ICC = 0.97; CV = 4.2%) and between-session reliability (ICC = 0.89).
- 🌈 Consistency: CMJ values were more consistent than SJ values.
- 💡 No significant effects of lighting or skin pigmentation on AI accuracy were observed.
- ⚖️ Caution advised: Practitioners should interpret absolute values cautiously, especially for SJ.
- 🌍 Study supports the use of AI and computer vision in democratizing biomechanical assessments.

📚 Background
Accurate measurement of jump height is crucial in sports science and athletic training. Traditional methods, such as infrared contact mats, have been widely used but can be limited by factors such as cost and accessibility. The emergence of AI-based applications offers a promising alternative, potentially allowing for more widespread use in various athletic populations.
🗒️ Study
The study conducted by Ríos-Gallardo et al. aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the My Jump Lab app in measuring jump heights among a diverse group of recreationally active adults. Participants performed both countermovement jumps and squat jumps, with measurements taken using both the AI app and a force platform to establish a comparative baseline.
📈 Results
The results revealed that while the AI app consistently overestimated jump height, it maintained a high level of concurrent validity (R² = 0.94) and strong reliability metrics. The within-session reliability was particularly impressive, with an ICC of 0.97 and a CV of 4.2%. Notably, the study found no significant influence of lighting conditions or skin pigmentation on the accuracy of the AI measurements.
🌍 Impact and Implications
The findings from this study have significant implications for the field of sports science and athletic training. By demonstrating that AI-based applications can provide reliable and valid measurements, practitioners can utilize these tools to enhance training protocols and performance assessments. This democratization of biomechanical assessments could lead to improved athlete monitoring and development without compromising measurement quality.
🔮 Conclusion
In conclusion, the My Jump Lab app represents a promising advancement in the field of jump height assessment. While it is essential to interpret absolute values with caution, the app’s high validity and reliability suggest it can serve as a valuable tool for coaches and athletes alike. Continued research and development in AI technologies will likely further enhance the accuracy and accessibility of biomechanical assessments in sports.
💬 Your comments
What are your thoughts on the use of AI in sports performance measurement? We would love to hear your insights! 💬 Join the conversation in the comments below or connect with us on social media:
Validity and Reliability of an AI-Based Jump Height App vs. Infrared Contact Mat: Minimal Influence of Skin Pigmentation Under Standardized Lighting.
Abstract
Ríos-Gallardo, PT, Carranza-García, LE, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Gonzalez, MP, Balsalobre-Fernández, C, Dorgo, S, and Montalvo, S. Validity and reliability of an AI-based jump height app vs. infrared contact mat: minimal influence of skin pigmentation under standardized lighting. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-This study examined the validity, reliability, and visual robustness of an artificial intelligence-based mobile application (My Jump Lab) for measuring countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) height across a heterogeneous athletic population. A dual-session, test-retest design was implemented with 43 recreationally active adults (age: 21.2 ± 2.4 years), who performed 3 maximal-effort SJ and CMJ trials per session. Jump height was concurrently recorded using a force platform and the AI-based app. Validity was assessed through linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses, and reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). A linear mixed-effects model tested whether body dimensions, lighting conditions, or skin pigmentation influenced AI accuracy. The AI systematically overestimated jump height (bias = +2.81 cm, p < 0.001), yet showed excellent concurrent validity (R2 = 0.94), strong within-session reliability (ICC = 0.97; CV = 4.2%), and good between-session reliability (ICC = 0.89). Countermovement jump values were more consistent than SJ. No significant effects were observed for lighting or pigmentation (p > 0.05). Although absolute error was higher in SJ, AI-based estimates remained stable across conditions. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. In conclusion, the AI-based app provides a valid and reliable alternative for field-based jump assessment. However, practitioners should interpret absolute values cautiously, especially for SJ. These findings support the utility of computer vision and AI to democratize biomechanical assessments without sacrificing measurement quality.
Author: [‘Ríos-Gallardo PT’, ‘Carranza-García LE’, ‘Dietze-Hermosa M’, ‘Gonzalez MP’, ‘Balsalobre-Fernández C’, ‘Dorgo S’, ‘Montalvo S’]
Journal: J Strength Cond Res
Citation: Ríos-Gallardo PT, et al. Validity and Reliability of an AI-Based Jump Height App vs. Infrared Contact Mat: Minimal Influence of Skin Pigmentation Under Standardized Lighting. Validity and Reliability of an AI-Based Jump Height App vs. Infrared Contact Mat: Minimal Influence of Skin Pigmentation Under Standardized Lighting. 2026; (unknown volume):(unknown pages). doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005433