โก Quick Summary
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD) using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The findings suggest that AI models can achieve a sensitivity of up to 96% and specificity of 99% for ECG signal segmentation, indicating a promising avenue for early detection of SCD.
๐ Key Details
- ๐ Dataset: 27 studies, 2,613 patients
- ๐งฉ Features used: ECG signals and heart rate variability
- โ๏ธ Technology: Various AI models evaluated
- ๐ Performance: Sensitivity up to 96%, specificity up to 99%
๐ Key Takeaways
- ๐ค AI shows significant potential for predicting sudden cardiac death through ECG analysis.
- ๐ High sensitivity (up to 96%) and specificity (up to 99%) were observed in AI models for ECG signal segmentation.
- ๐ The study included a total of 2,613 patients across 27 studies, highlighting a robust dataset.
- ๐ Heterogeneity among studies indicates variability in AI model performance.
- โ ๏ธ Current evidence is preliminary and derived from idealized research settings.
- ๐ Need for multicenter studies to establish generalizability and clinical applicability.
- ๐ ๏ธ QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality, ensuring rigorous evaluation.
- ๐ AUC values for AI models ranged from 0.93 to 0.99, indicating strong predictive capabilities.

๐ Background
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, often occurring unexpectedly. Traditional methods of predicting SCD have limitations, prompting researchers to explore the potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. By leveraging ECG signals, AI can analyze complex patterns that may indicate a heightened risk of SCD, offering a promising tool for early intervention.
๐๏ธ Study
The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AI in detecting SCD through ECG analysis. Researchers conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed and IEEE Xplore, to identify relevant studies published until April 2025. A total of 27 studies were included in the final analysis, encompassing a diverse patient population and various AI methodologies.
๐ Results
The analysis revealed that AI models demonstrated impressive performance metrics. For heart rate variability, the sensitivity was found to be 0.90 with a specificity of 0.91, yielding an AUC of 0.93. In terms of ECG signal segmentation, the sensitivity reached 0.96 and specificity 0.99, with an AUC of 0.99. Direct input of ECG lead signals yielded a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.91, with an AUC of 0.95.
๐ Impact and Implications
The findings from this meta-analysis underscore the transformative potential of AI in the realm of cardiology. By improving the accuracy of SCD predictions, AI could facilitate timely interventions, ultimately saving lives. However, the variability in study results highlights the necessity for further research, particularly prospective, multicenter studies that adhere to standardized methodologies to validate these findings in real-world clinical settings.
๐ฎ Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis provide compelling evidence that AI-based ECG analysis holds significant promise for predicting sudden cardiac death. While the results are encouraging, they also emphasize the need for more rigorous studies to establish the clinical applicability of these technologies. As we move forward, the integration of AI into routine cardiac care could revolutionize how we approach SCD prevention, paving the way for enhanced patient outcomes.
๐ฌ Your comments
What are your thoughts on the role of AI in predicting sudden cardiac death? We would love to hear your insights! ๐ฌ Leave your comments below or connect with us on social media:
Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram signals for sudden cardiac death prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting sudden cardiac death on electrocardiogram (ECG).
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore for studies published through April 2025 evaluating AI models for ECG-based sudden cardiac death detection, using expert consensus or database records as the reference standard. A bivariate random-effects model generated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates. Heterogeneity was quantified via I2 and ฯ2 statistics. Study quality was appraised using the revised QUADAS-2 tool, with evidence certainty graded via the GRADE assessment.
RESULTS: Out of 958 initially identified studies, 27 studies with 2613 patients and images were ultimately included for the final analysis. For heart rate variability, AI demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96), with an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95). For ECG signal segmentation, AI demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00), with an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). For direct input of ECG lead signals, AI demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.61-0.97) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97), with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates that AI-based ECG analysis shows potential for SCD prediction. However, the summary estimates are derived from highly heterogeneous studies and should not be considered benchmarks for clinical performance. The current evidence remains preliminary and derived from idealized research settings, underscoring the need for prospective, multicenter studies with standardized methodologies to establish generalizability and clinical applicability.
Author: [‘He S’, ‘Du M’, ‘Wang Z’, ‘Zang Y’, ‘Ning G’, ‘Pang S’, ‘Wan Y’, ‘Wang Y’, ‘Zuo M’, ‘Luan B’, ‘Duan N’]
Journal: Syst Rev
Citation: He S, et al. Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram signals for sudden cardiac death prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram signals for sudden cardiac death prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2025; (unknown volume):(unknown pages). doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-03033-5